Active vs Passive: The Hard Truth

The Active Management Myth

Data from JustETF and SPIVA scorecards reveals why "beating the market" is a losing game for the vast majority of investors.

The 10-Year Failure Rate

Across almost every major equity market, the vast majority of active fund managers fail to outperform their benchmark index over a 10-year period.

95% of US Equity Funds Failed
96% of Global Equity Funds Failed

Time is the Enemy

Active managers might get lucky in the short term, but the probability of outperformance collapses as the time horizon extends.

% of Active Funds Underperforming Benchmarks (Europe)

Nowhere to Hide

Even in "inefficient" markets like Emerging Markets, active managers struggle to beat the index consistently.

The Fee Drag Simulator

Active funds typically charge 1% - 2% fees. Passive ETFs often charge less than 0.2%. See how a "small" 1.5% fee difference destroys wealth over 30 years.

Final Portfolio Value (Passive) Final Portfolio Value (Active)
100%
Lost to Fees

Assumes 7% annual market return. The active investor loses 34% of their potential final wealth solely due to a 1.5% fee difference.

The Vanishing Funds

Performance data is often skewed by "Survivorship Bias". Poorly performing funds are quietly closed or merged, deleting their bad records from history.

~60% Funds Merged/Closed (20yrs)
Deleted Poor performance records vanish
Inflation Remaining avg looks better

Luck, Not Skill

The "Persistence Scorecard" shows that top quartile managers rarely stay in the top quartile.

  • Top funds in 2019 rarely remained top in 2023.
  • Performance flip-flops randomly year to year.
  • Consistent outperformance is statistically effectively zero.

Data Sources: JustETF "The proof that active managers cannot beat the market", SPIVA Europe & US Scorecards.

This infographic is for educational purposes only.